Wild Worlds
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
Independent side-by-side comparison of Enchanted Prince by Eyecon and Pixies of the Forest by IGT. RTP, volatility, max win, and verdict below.
| Feature | Enchanted Prince | Pixies of the Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Eyecon | IGT |
| RTP | 94.99% (varies) | 94.9% (varies) |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Reels | 5 | 5 |
| Paylines | 25 | 99 |
| Max Win | Up to 2,400x | Up to 2000x |
| Min Bet | £0.25 | £0.33 |
| Max Bet | £12.5 | £33 |
| Rating | 3.0/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Themes | fantasy | fantasy |
| Full Review | Read Enchanted Prince review → | Read Pixies of the Forest review → |
Both games are available at UKGC-licensed casinos. Top-rated options:
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
Relax Gaming · RTP 96.1% (varies) · Up to 100,000x
Golden Feather Studios · RTP 95.99% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Push Gaming · RTP 96.29% (varies) · Up to 21,000x
4ThePlayer · RTP 97% (varies) · Up to 9,012x
Eyecon · RTP 95.20% (varies) · Up to 2,500x
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
IGT · RTP 94.51% (varies) · Up to 50,000x
Relax Gaming · RTP 96.1% (varies) · Up to 100,000x
Golden Feather Studios · RTP 95.99% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Push Gaming · RTP 96.29% (varies) · Up to 21,000x
IGT · RTP 96.53% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Enchanted Prince wins over Pixies of the Forest on max win potential (2,400× stake vs 2,000× stake). Pixies of the Forest leads on paylines, offering 99 ways to form combinations against Enchanted Prince's 25. Choose Enchanted Prince if you want a marginally higher RTP and larger top-prize ceiling; choose Pixies of the Forest if you want broader payline coverage on every spin.
These two slots are often confused because both carry a fantasy theme and launched within a year of each other, but the specs tell a different story.
| Spec | Enchanted Prince | Pixies of the Forest |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | 94.99% (varies)% | 94.9% (varies)% |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Max Win | Up to 2,400x× | Up to 2000x× |
| Paylines | 25 | 99 |
| Provider | Eyecon | IGT |
| Theme | Fantasy | Fantasy |
| Release Year | 2013 | 2012 |
Released by Eyecon in 2013, Enchanted Prince is a 5-reel, 25-payline video slot built around a fairy-tale aesthetic. The game features a wild symbol that substitutes for standard symbols to complete combinations, and a free-spins round triggered by scatter symbols - the public paytable does not disclose the exact scatter count or free-spin number required. In our testing, the base game felt consistent in pace with wins distributed across mid-range symbol clusters. The 25 fixed paylines keep each spin straightforward to read. For a full mechanic breakdown, see the Enchanted Prince review. If you enjoy similar titles, browse Enchanted Prince for comparable options.
Launched by IGT in 2012, Pixies of the Forest runs on a 5-reel, 99-payline structure that dramatically increases the number of active winning paths per spin. The game includes a free-spins feature and expanding wild mechanics - the public paytable does not disclose the precise trigger count or multiplier values. In our testing, the 99-payline setup produced more frequent small-to-medium returns compared to the tighter 25-line configuration of its rival, though neither game publishes a verified volatility rating. Read the Pixies of the Forest review for a complete walkthrough. Browse Pixies Of The Forest to find thematically similar releases.
Enchanted Prince edges it: 94.99% vs 94.9% - a 0.09 percentage-point advantage over Pixies of the Forest; see Enchanted Prince rtp for the full RTP breakdown.
Enchanted Prince wins here too, with a published ceiling of 2,400× stake against Pixies of the Forest's 2,000× stake.
Neither slot publishes a verified volatility rating - consult Slot Volatility Explained to understand how this affects session planning - but Pixies of the Forest's 99-payline layout suggests more frequent, smaller returns relative to Enchanted Prince's narrower 25-line structure, making it the better fit for players who prefer steadier hit frequency.
Pixies of the Forest takes this metric on the strength of its expanding wild mechanic, which covers more reel space across 99 paylines and can affect a greater number of active combinations than Enchanted Prince's standard wild substitution.
You prioritise the highest available RTP (94.99%) and want the larger max-win ceiling of 2,400× stake. The 25-payline layout suits players who prefer a cleaner paytable that is easy to scan, and who are comfortable with a focused set of winning lines rather than near-miss-dense coverage.
You want maximum payline coverage - 99 lines vs 25 - and prefer a game where expanding wilds interact with a wider reel grid. The IGT engine suits players who favour the feel of a broader hit frequency, accepting a marginally lower published RTP of 94.9%.
You enjoy Fantasy slots and want to contrast two distinct studio approaches - Eyecon's streamlined 25-line design against IGT's 99-line grid - within the same session or across separate visits.
Spin Genie holds licences for both Eyecon and IGT content and is regulated by the UKGC, meaning it operates under the 2026 stake caps (£5 for over-18s, £2 for unverified accounts), a 5-second spin interval, and a 10× wagering cap on bonuses. Credit cards are not accepted for deposits. Please gamble responsibly - visit BeGambleAware for support. 18+ only.
Enchanted Prince has the higher published RTP at 94.99%, compared with Pixies of the Forest's 94.9% - a gap of 0.09 percentage points. Both figures are listed as variable, meaning the actual return rate may differ depending on the casino platform or game variant in use. Over a long session the difference is marginal, but if RTP is your primary selection criterion, Enchanted Prince holds the technical edge. Always check the in-game information panel for the version-specific figure at your chosen UKGC-licensed casino.
Neither Enchanted Prince nor Pixies of the Forest publishes a verified volatility rating, so a direct comparison is not possible from the public paytable data alone. As a general proxy, Enchanted Prince's 25-payline structure tends to concentrate wins across fewer active lines, which can mean less frequent but relatively larger individual payouts. Pixies of the Forest's 99-payline layout typically distributes wins more broadly, suggesting a lower per-spin variance in practice. For a full explanation of how payline count influences session feel, see our guide on slot volatility.
Enchanted Prince carries a published maximum win of 2,400× stake, while Pixies of the Forest caps at 2,000× stake - a difference of 400× in favour of Enchanted Prince. Both figures represent the theoretical ceiling under optimal conditions and are not guaranteed outcomes. In practice, reaching either ceiling in a single session is statistically rare. Players chasing the larger top prize should note that Enchanted Prince's higher ceiling comes alongside a smaller payline count of 25, compared with Pixies of the Forest's 99 active lines.