Age of the Gods
Playtech · RTP 95.02% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Independent side-by-side comparison of Gates of Camelot by Playtech and Pixies of the Forest by IGT. RTP, volatility, max win, and verdict below.
| Feature | Gates of Camelot | Pixies of the Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Playtech | IGT |
| RTP | 95.51% (varies) | 94.9% (varies) |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Reels | 5 | 5 |
| Paylines | 20 | 99 |
| Max Win | Up to 7,050x | Up to 2000x |
| Min Bet | £0.1 | £0.33 |
| Max Bet | £300 | £33 |
| Rating | 3.3/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Themes | fantasy | fantasy |
| Full Review | Read Gates of Camelot review → | Read Pixies of the Forest review → |
Both games are available at UKGC-licensed casinos. Top-rated options:
Playtech · RTP 95.02% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
Relax Gaming · RTP 96.1% (varies) · Up to 100,000x
Playtech · RTP 95.96% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Playtech · RTP 95.96% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Playtech · RTP 91.5% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
IGT · RTP 94.51% (varies) · Up to 50,000x
Relax Gaming · RTP 96.1% (varies) · Up to 100,000x
Golden Feather Studios · RTP 95.99% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Push Gaming · RTP 96.29% (varies) · Up to 21,000x
IGT · RTP 96.53% (varies) · Up to 10,000x
Gates of Camelot wins over Pixies of the Forest on max win potential (7,050× stake vs 2,000× stake - a 3.5× gap that is difficult to ignore). Pixies of the Forest leads on payline count, offering 99 ways versus Gates of Camelot's 20. Choose Gates of Camelot if you want higher RTP and larger top-end prizes; choose Pixies of the Forest if you want more paylines and a long-established classic from IGT.
Both slots share a fantasy theme, which often causes players to conflate them, but the specs tell a different story - one is a 2024 Playtech release chasing high multipliers, the other a 2012 IGT veteran built around payline volume.
| Spec | Gates of Camelot | Pixies of the Forest |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | 95.51% (varies)% | 94.9% (varies)% |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Max Win | Up to 7,050x× | Up to 2000x× |
| Paylines | 20 | 99 |
| Provider | Playtech | IGT |
| Theme | Fantasy | Fantasy |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2012 |
Gates of Camelot is a 2024 video slot from Playtech, built on a 20-payline structure set against an Arthurian legend backdrop. The reel set draws on swords, shields, and court imagery, with a stated RTP of 95.51% that may vary depending on the operator configuration. In our testing, the 20-payline layout meant individual line hits were less frequent but carried more weight per trigger. The public paytable does not disclose the specific scatter count required to trigger the bonus round or the exact free spin award. For a full breakdown of all mechanics, see our Gates of Camelot review. If you enjoy similar high-ceiling titles, Gates Of Camelot covers comparable options worth considering.
Pixies of the Forest is a 2012 video slot from IGT, operating across 99 paylines - a structure that generates frequent small-to-medium wins across a woodland-themed reel grid. The RTP sits at 94.9%, which varies by operator, and the maximum win reaches 2,000× stake. IGT built this title around a free-spin retrigger mechanic; the public paytable does not disclose the exact scatter count or the maximum retrigger cap. In our testing, the 99-payline layout produced a noticeably busier hit rate than Gates of Camelot's 20 lines, making sessions feel more sustained rather than spike-driven. See Pixies of the Forest review for the full feature analysis, or browse Pixies Of The Forest for comparable alternatives.
Gates of Camelot edges it on Gates of Camelot rtp: 95.51% versus Pixies of the Forest's 94.9%, a 0.61 percentage-point advantage that compounds meaningfully over longer sessions.
Gates of Camelot wins decisively: 7,050× stake versus Pixies of the Forest's 2,000× stake, representing more than three times the ceiling.
Neither slot publicly discloses a volatility rating - consult Slot Volatility Explained for how to interpret undisclosed variance - but the 99-payline structure of Pixies of the Forest typically implies a steadier hit frequency, while Gates of Camelot's 20-line design and 7,050× ceiling suggest a more spike-oriented profile suited to patient sessions.
Pixies of the Forest takes this category: its retrigger-capable free-spin round, combined with the 99-payline base, provides more mechanic touchpoints per session, whereas Gates of Camelot's bonus details are not fully disclosed in the public paytable.
You prioritise a higher stated RTP (95.51%) and want exposure to a 7,050× maximum win ceiling. Gates of Camelot suits players who are comfortable with a tighter 20-payline structure and are drawn to newer Playtech titles with Arthurian theming and modern presentation from a 2024 release.
You prefer a higher payline count - 99 lines generate a busier hit pattern that can suit players who find 20-line sessions too sparse. Pixies of the Forest also suits those who value an established IGT title with a track record dating to 2012, accepting a lower RTP of 94.9% in exchange for that frequency.
Variety matters more than optimisation for you. Rotating between a 20-line, high-ceiling modern title and a 99-line classic covers different session moods without requiring a commitment to either style exclusively.
Both Gates of Camelot and Pixies of the Forest are available at Genting Casino, a UKGC-licensed operator. UK players should note the £5 stake cap on certain products, the mandatory 5-second spin interval, and the 10× wagering cap on bonuses under current regulations. Always gamble responsibly - visit BeGambleAware for support. 18+ only.
Gates of Camelot has the higher RTP at 95.51%, compared with Pixies of the Forest's 94.9% - a gap of 0.61 percentage points. Both figures can vary by operator configuration, so the displayed RTP at your chosen casino may differ from the headline number. Over a long session, even a sub-1% RTP difference represents a meaningful shift in theoretical return, making Gates of Camelot the stronger choice purely on this metric. Always check the paytable or game info panel at your specific casino to confirm the active RTP variant before playing.
Neither Gates of Camelot nor Pixies of the Forest publicly discloses a classified volatility rating, so a direct comparison cannot be confirmed from the available data. However, Gates of Camelot's 20-payline structure combined with a 7,050× maximum win ceiling suggests a more spike-oriented profile - characteristics typically associated with higher variance. Pixies of the Forest's 99-payline layout generally implies a steadier hit frequency, which is more commonly linked to medium or lower volatility behaviour. Players sensitive to bankroll swings may find Pixies of the Forest produces a more consistent session rhythm, though neither slot confirms this formally.
No - Pixies of the Forest has significantly more paylines than Gates of Camelot. Pixies of the Forest operates across 99 paylines, while Gates of Camelot uses 20 paylines. The higher payline count in Pixies of the Forest typically results in more frequent base-game wins, though those wins may individually be smaller in value. Gates of Camelot compensates with a substantially higher maximum win of 7,050× stake versus Pixies of the Forest's 2,000× ceiling, so the two slots represent different trade-offs between win frequency and peak potential.