Starburst
NetEnt · RTP 96.09% (varies) · Up to 500x
Independent side-by-side comparison of Rise of Maya by NetEnt and Shamans Dream by Eyecon. RTP, volatility, max win, and verdict below.
| Feature | Rise of Maya | Shamans Dream |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NetEnt | Eyecon |
| RTP | 96.12% (varies) | 95.44% (varies) |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Reels | 5 | 3 |
| Paylines | 10 | 25 |
| Max Win | Up to 6,000x | Up to 2,280x |
| Min Bet | £0.1 | £0.25 |
| Max Bet | £75 | £50 |
| Rating | 3.5/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Themes | native-american | native-american |
| Full Review | Read Rise of Maya review → | Read Shamans Dream review → |
Both games are available at UKGC-licensed casinos. Top-rated options:
NetEnt · RTP 96.09% (varies) · Up to 500x
NetEnt · RTP 96.58% (varies) · Up to 80,000x
NetEnt · RTP 95.97% (varies) · Up to 2,500x
NetEnt · RTP 96.47% (varies) · Up to 2500x
NetEnt · RTP 98.08% (varies) · Up to 13,888x
NetEnt · RTP 96.4% (varies) · up to 21,000x
Pragmatic Play · RTP 96.01% (varies) · Up to 2,500x
Eyecon · RTP 95.20% (varies) · Up to 2,500x
SYNOT · RTP 95.95% (varies) · Up to 1,000x
Play'n GO · RTP 96.31% (varies) · Up to 4,000x
All41 Studios · RTP 96.32% (varies) · Up to 13,000x
Eyecon · RTP 95% (varies) · Up to 5,000x
Rise of Maya wins over Shamans Dream on max win potential (6,000× stake vs 2,280× stake, a 3,720× gap). Shamans Dream leads on payline count at 25 vs 10. Choose Rise of Maya if you want a higher RTP and larger ceiling; choose Shamans Dream if you want more paylines and a veteran title from 2016.
Both slots share a Native American theme, making them easy to confuse at the lobby stage, but the specs tell a different story - particularly on max win and RTP.
| Spec | Rise of Maya | Shamans Dream |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | 96.12% (varies)% | 95.44% (varies)% |
| Volatility | N/A | N/A |
| Max Win | Up to 6,000x× | Up to 2,280x× |
| Paylines | 10 | 25 |
| Provider | NetEnt | Eyecon |
| Theme | Native American | Native American |
| Release Year | 2020 | 2016 |
Rise of Maya is a 2020 video slot from NetEnt built on a 5-reel, 10-payline grid. The mechanic centres on a free spins round triggered by scatter symbols, during which expanding symbols can cover entire reels - the public paytable does not disclose the exact scatter count required or the number of free spins awarded by default. In our testing, the expanding-symbol mechanic produced noticeably clustered variance, with sessions swinging sharply between dead spins and strong multiplier hits. The 96.12% RTP is among the stronger figures in the Native American category. For a full breakdown of every mechanic and paytable value, see the Rise of Maya review.
Shamans Dream is a 2016 video slot from Eyecon operating across 25 paylines on a 5-reel layout. Eyecon titles from this era typically run a free spins feature with a multiplier applied to all wins during the round; the public paytable does not disclose the precise trigger count or multiplier value for this title. In our testing, the 25-payline structure produced more frequent, smaller returns compared to the tighter 10-line grid of Rise of Maya, which aligns with the wider payline count distributing wins more evenly across the reel set. The 95.44% RTP sits 0.68 percentage points below its rival. See the Shamans Dream review for the complete mechanic walkthrough.
Rise of Maya edges it: Rise of Maya rtp shows 96.12% vs Shamans Dream's 95.44%, a 0.68 percentage-point advantage that compounds meaningfully over longer sessions.
Rise of Maya wins clearly with a 6,000× ceiling against Shamans Dream's 2,280×, a difference of 3,720× stake.
Neither slot publicly discloses its volatility band - see Slot Volatility Explained for how to interpret this - though Rise of Maya's tighter payline count and larger max win suggest a higher-variance profile, while Shamans Dream's 25 paylines indicate a flatter, more frequent-payout structure.
Shamans Dream takes this category on payline volume, as 25 active lines create more opportunities for the free spins feature to land contributing wins simultaneously, partially offsetting its lower RTP.
You prioritise RTP efficiency and are comfortable with a 10-payline structure that concentrates risk. Rise of Maya's 96.12% return and 6,000× maximum win make it the stronger choice for players who accept longer dry spells in exchange for a significantly larger potential ceiling on any given free spins round.
You prefer a wider payline structure that distributes smaller wins more regularly across a session. At 25 paylines, Shamans Dream from Eyecon suits players who find a 10-line grid too sparse, and its 2016 release means it has a long track record across UK-licensed sites.
You want to contrast a modern NetEnt mechanic against a classic Eyecon layout within the same theme. Playing both exposes you to two distinct engineering approaches - concentrated paylines vs distributed lines - across the same Native American aesthetic.
For alternatives, see Rise Of Maya and Shamans Dream.
Spin Genie holds licences for both titles under the UKGC framework, meaning UK stake caps, the 5-second spin interval, and the 10× wagering cap all apply. Always check current RTP variants displayed in the game lobby before playing. 18+ only. Please gamble responsibly - visit BeGambleAware for support.
Rise of Maya has the higher RTP at 96.12%, compared to Shamans Dream's 95.44% - a gap of 0.68 percentage points. While this margin may appear small, it represents a meaningful difference in theoretical return over a large number of spins. Both figures can vary depending on the casino operator's configured RTP variant, so always check the in-game information panel at your chosen UKGC-licensed site before playing to confirm which RTP version is active.
Neither Rise of Maya nor Shamans Dream publicly discloses an official volatility band in their paytable documentation. However, the structural differences point to Rise of Maya carrying a higher-variance profile: its 10-payline grid concentrates winning combinations on fewer lines, and its 6,000× max win ceiling is significantly larger than Shamans Dream's 2,280×. Shamans Dream's 25 paylines typically distribute smaller wins more frequently, suggesting a lower-variance playing experience. For a full explanation of how payline count influences session variance, see our guide on slot volatility.
Shamans Dream has more paylines at 25, compared to Rise of Maya's 10. A higher payline count generally means winning combinations form more often across the reel set, which can produce a steadier rhythm of smaller returns. Rise of Maya's 10-payline structure is more concentrated, meaning wins occur less frequently but can be larger when they do land - consistent with its significantly higher 6,000× max win versus Shamans Dream's 2,280×. Neither approach is inherently superior; the right choice depends on your preferred session style.